Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/pediatrics/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2026-04.txt) [function.fopen]: failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/virtual/pediatrics/journal/ip_info/view_data.php on line 93

Warning: fwrite(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /home/virtual/pediatrics/journal/ip_info/view_data.php on line 94
Outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for pediatric patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia in Thailand

Outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for pediatric patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia in Thailand

Article information

Clin Exp Pediatr. 2026;69(4):340-352
Publication date (electronic) : 2026 March 13
doi : https://doi.org/10.3345/cep.2025.02173
1Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
2Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
3Center of Excellence in Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
4Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand
5Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Phramongkutklao Hospital and Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand
Corresponding author: Suradej Hongeng, MD. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand Email: suradej.hon@mahidol.ac.th
Received 2025 September 17; Revised 2025 November 29; Accepted 2025 December 18.

Abstract

Background

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a curative treatment for patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT), and the outcomes are influenced by multiple factors.

Purpose

We retrospectively evaluated the clinical characteristics, risk factors, complications, and treatment outcomes in Thai patients aged <20 years using 30-year multicenter HSCT data. This study sought to evaluate the contributing factors affecting survival outcomes and complications, provide insights into the evolution of HSCT for TDT, and inform practice guidelines in developing countries.

Methods

The outcomes of 266 HSCT procedures from related and unrelated donors in 249 Thai patients with TDT performed from 1988 to 2016 (median follow-up, 102 months) were analyzed.

Results

The median age at HSCT was 6.9 years (range, 1−19 years). Most HSCT procedures used human leukocyte antigen-matched related donors (MRDs; 71.8%), with bone marrow serving as the primary graft source (69.5%). The thalassemia recurrence rate was 11.6%, whereas the mortality rate was 9.0%, primarily due to Gram-negative sepsis. The 5-year overall (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were 91.3% and 81.0%, respectively. The outcomes did not differ significantly between MRDs and matched unrelated donors (MUDs: OS rate, 91.5% vs. 88.0%, P=0.52; EFS rate, 82.0% vs. 76.2%, P=0.45). Since 2000, advances in pre-HSCT transfusion, iron chelation, graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, and supportive care have been implemented, with intravenous busulfan adopted after 2009. Over three periods (1988−1999, 2000−2009, and 2010−2016), the OS rate rose from 89.4% to 93.0% (P=0.74), and the EFS rate rose from 67.7% to 87.2% (P=0.01). Age ≤10 years was associated with better overall OS and EFS, although significance was limited to the earliest period. A multivariate analysis identified a pre-HSCT ferritin level >2,500 ng/mL, low CD34+ doses, and the use of oral busulfan conditioning as factors associated with unfavorable survival. Long-term complications, primarily endocrine disorders, affected 22.7% of survivors.

Conclusion

Our results broaden the donor pool by demonstrating comparable outcomes between MRD and MUD transplantation. Optimizing pretransplant care, such as regular pre-HSCT transfusion, adjusting conditioning intensity, and improving posttransplant supportive care, may mitigate age-related risks in older recipients.

Key message

Question: Can hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) cure pediatric transfusion-dependent thalassemia in Thailand? What influences its outcomes?

Finding: Among 266 HSCT procedures, 5-year overall survival and event-free survival rates were 91.3% and 81.0%, respectively. Outcomes were comparable between related and unrelated donors. Pre-HSCT ferritin >2,500 ng/mL, low CD34+ cell dose, and oral busulfan conditioning were associated with unfavorable survival. Long-term complications affected 22.7% of survivors.

Meaning: Optimizing pre-HSCT care, ensuring adequate grafting, and long-term surveillance are crucial.

Graphical abstract

Introduction

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curative therapy for transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT). Since the first HSCT for thalassemia performed by Thomas et al. [1], outcomes have improved substantially. A long-term survival comparison between human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched related donor (MRD) and matched unrelated donor (MUD) HSCT versus standard transfusion plus iron chelation in TDT children and adults revealed no significant difference in 30-year overall survival (OS; 82.6% vs. 85.3%) [2]. HSCT-related mortality (13.8%) was comparable to cardiovascular-related mortality (12.2%) in the transfusion group. In another retrospective analysis of 1,493 TDT patients; 91% under 18 years old (European Society for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplantation; EBMT Hemoglobinopathy Registry, 2000−2010), the 2-year OS was 88% and event-free survival (EFS) was 81% [3]. These findings underscore HSCT as a viable curative option for TDT when an HLA-matched donor is available, although pre-HSCT risk factors still affect outcomes. HSCT success in TDT is influenced by multifactorial factors such as age, clinical status before HSCT, donor type, HLA compatibility, and stem cell source. The Pesaro risk assessment [4]—which considers liver size, fibrosis, and iron chelation adherence—stratifies patients into risk classes, with higher mortality in classes II and III. This model has limitations, including the invasiveness of liver biopsy and varying definitions of adequate chelation. Furthermore, studies have identified higher-risk patients with poorer HSCT outcomes, such as those who are older, have severe iron overload or hepatomegaly, or exhibit alloimmunization from chronic transfusions [5-8].

In Thailand, the first successful HSCT for TDT was performed in 1988 at Siriraj Hospital. Multiple centers subsequently adopted HSCT for TDT patients. Here, we present a 30-year multicenter analysis of Thai patients younger than 20 years who underwent HSCT for TDT. The study aims to evaluate contributing factors affecting survival outcomes and complications which provide insights into HSCT evolution of TDT, to guide future practice in developing countries.

Methods

1. Study design

We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of HSCT in TDT patients who underwent related or unrelated HSCT at 5 major transplant centers in Thailand: Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital and Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University; Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University; Phramongkutklao Hospital and Phramongkutklao College of Medicine; and Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University. The study included transplants performed from January 1988 to December 2016, with follow-up until December 2021. Haploidentical HSCT procedures were excluded. Lucarelli risk classification was not feasible because liver biopsy was not performed in most cases. Instead, high-risk patients were identified based on age ≥10 years and hepatomegaly, as reported elsewhere [5,6,8].

2. Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital (Si 658/2015), in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (1975) and its subsequent revisions. The protocol was registered in the Thai Clinical Trial Registry (TCTR20220905001).

3. Data collection

Collected data included demographic details, thalassemia type, liver and spleen size, transfusion history, serum ferritin (SF) levels, pre-HSCT splenectomy, HSCT complications, chimerism data, and outcomes. Histocompatibility was determined by serologic or DNA-based testing. Beginning in 2000, typing methods advanced from intermediate to high resolution and from 6−8 to 8−10 loci.

4. HSCT supportive care

The majority of patients received oral gentamicin before 2000 and ciprofloxacin thereafter for gut decontamination. Prophylactic antifungal therapy was administered during the first 100 days after HSCT, using oral nystatin or itraconazole before 2000, and fluconazole or posaconazole thereafter. Antifungal prophylaxis was extended beyond day 100 in patients who required additional immunosuppressive therapy for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis was initiated after stable engraftment and continued for 3 months after discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapy. After 2000, post-HSCT monitoring enhancements included DNA chimerism monitoring, cytomegalovirus surveillance, and refined GVHD prophylaxis with mycophenolate mofetil for most unrelated donor procedures. From 2010 onward, all centers adopted intravenous busulfan instead of oral busulfan, using a nomogram to guide dosing as previously described [9]. Most patients underwent pharmacokinetic monitoring for dose optimization.

5. Periods of analysis

To evaluate outcome patterns, data were categorized into 3 time periods based on the year of transplantation: P1 (1988−1999), P2 (2000−2009), and P3 (2010−2016).

6. Definitions and outcomes

TDT was defined as thalassemia patient who required regular blood transfusions every 2−5 weeks to maintain a pretransfusion hemoglobin (Hb) level 9−10 g/dL. GVHD and hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) were defined according to established criteria [10-12]. Neutrophil engraftment was the first of 3 consecutive days with an absolute neutrophil count > 500/mm3. Platelet engraftment was the first of 7 consecutive days with a platelet count >20 000/mm3 without transfusions. Red blood cell transfusion independence was recorded as the first day on which no transfusions were required. The median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment applies to patients who achieved primary engraftment, excluding cases of graft failure or pre-engraftment mortality. Chimerism status was defined as full and mixed donor chimerism (DC), corresponding to >95 and 5%–95% donor DNA, respectively. OS was defined as the time from HSCT to death from any cause, with patients alive at the last follow-up censored at the last contact date. EFS was defined as the time from HSCT to the first event, including graft failure, graft rejection, thalassemia recurrence, or death; patients without events were censored at the last follow-up date. Patients who lost to follow up were censored at their last known contact date. Graft failure was defined as the failure of primary neutrophil or platelet engraftment. Graft rejection was the loss of a previously successful engraftment, characterized by a progressive decline and loss of DC. Thalassemia recurrence was defined by the reestablishment of a thalassemia disease with transfusion-dependent state after HSCT.

7. Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics were calculated using PASW Statistics ver. 18.0 (SPSS Inc., USA). Fisher exact test or Pearson chi-square test (as appropriate) was applied to compare parameters across the different HSCT groups. Missing data were handled using complete-case analysis, with the denominators (N) reported for each comparison in the table.

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to evaluate selected variables, and statistical significance was determined using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to determine the effect of potential covariates on OS and EFS. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors significantly and independently associated with long-term endocrine side effects. Statistical significance was defined as a P value ≤0.05.

Results

A total of 266 HSCTs were performed in 249 TDT patients. The 5-year OS and EFS for the entire cohort was 91.3% and 81.0%, respectively. Survival did not differ significantly by stem cell source or donor type. Of these, 31 experienced thalassemia recurrence; 17 patients proceeded to a second HSCT (6.4% of all transplants). Most HSCTs (75.9%) had Hb E/β-TDT, and HLA-MRD transplants were most common (71.8%). Bone marrow (BM) remained the primary stem cell source (69.5%), although the use of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) increased significantly in P2 and P3 (P<0.01). Table 1 summarizes patient characteristics and HSCT details across each study period. The median age at HSCT was 6.9 years, and 14 HSCTs (5.3%) were performed at age >15 years. Patients transplanted after 1999 were significantly older (P<0.001), with a greater proportion of patients aged >10 years in P3 > P2 > P1 (P=0.03). Pre-HSCT splenectomy was performed in 38 patients (14.3% of HSCTs), except for 1 patient who underwent the procedure before a second HSCT.

Baseline characteristics of patients and HSCTs by transplantation period

Most patients (92.5%) received regular transfusions, and 70.2% had iron chelation therapy before HSCT, with a median SF of 1,728 ng/mL. The proportion of patients on regular transfusions and iron chelation increased significantly over time (P<0.01). There were no significant differences in liver size, pre-HSCT SF, or CD34+ cell doses across the 3 periods. The majority of patients received busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens without radiation. High-risk patients were identified in 33 HSCTs (12.4%). Beginning in 2000, these patients received pre-HSCT immunosuppressive therapy with hydroxyurea and/or azathioprine plus or minus 1−2 courses of fludarabine and dexamethasone. Thirty-two high-risk patients (12%) underwent reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) with fludarabine, busulfan, and anti-thymocyte globulin, as previously reported [8]. These patients received PBSC targeting a CD34+ dose of 5−10×106 cells/kg. Cyclosporine and methotrexate were the most common GVHD prophylaxis (72.1% of HSCTs). Mycophenolate mofetil was added in most MUD and mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) transplants (62.6% in P2 and 64.5% in P3).

The median follow-up time for this cohort was 102 months (range, 5 days−359 months). Among the 266 HSCTs, thalassemia recurrence occurred in 11.6%, with the highest rate in P1. The cumulative incidence of thalassemia recurrence at 5-year post-HSCT was 12.3%. Outcomes by transplant period are summarized in Table 2. The overall mortality rate was 9.0%. A total of 24 patients died, of whom 16 (66.7%) succumbed to infections, primarily Gram-negative sepsis. Bleeding was the second most common cause of death (20%), including 3 cases of pulmonary hemorrhage and 2 cases of intracerebral hemorrhage. VOD occurred in 12.4% of transplants, mostly mild or moderate. Acute GVHD developed in 26.7%, and chronic GVHD in 14.7% of patients. Incidence of acute and chronic GVHD was significantly higher in P2 and P3 than in P1. Three patients died from infections during chronic GVHD, and one died during acute GVHD.

Outcomes after HSCT stratified by transplantation period

1. MRD- versus MUD-HSCT

Given that MUD-HSCT was introduced in P2, and patients in P2 and P3 were significantly older, the comparison of MRD versus MUD outcomes was restricted to these later periods (194 HSCTs in total). There were no significant differences between MRD- and MUD-HSCT regarding stem cell source, patient age at HSCT, engraftment time, mortality, or thalassemia recurrence rates. However, acute complications, particularly VOD (P=0.015) and acute GVHD (P<0.001), were significantly more common in MUD-HSCT. The characteristics and outcomes of MRD- versus MUD-HSCT are shown in Table 3.

Characteristics and outcomes of HSCT (2000–2016) by donor type

2. Survival by type of donors

Among those receiving HLA-MRD versus MUD transplants, 5-year OS was 91.5% and 88.0%, respectively (P=0.52), and 5-year EFS was 82.0% versus 76.2%, respectively (P=0.45). All 9 patients who underwent mis-MRD transplants survived, although 2 experienced graft rejection, yielding a 5-year EFS of 77.8%. In contrast, all 7 patients who received MMUD-HSCT survived and achieved thalassemia-free status. Figs. 1 and 2 illustrate OS and EFS for all related donor versus unrelated donor transplants.

Fig. 1.

Overall survival of related (n=200) versus unrelated (n=66) donor transplantation recipients.

Fig. 2.

Event-free survival of related (n=200) versus unrelated (n=66) donor transplantation recipients.

3. Survival by transplant period

While the 5-year OS improved numerically across the 3 transplant periods (P1, P2, P3), the difference was not statistically significant. However, 5-year EFS increased significantly over the same periods (Table 4). Figs. 3 and 4 depict OS and EFS in P1, P2, and P3.

Univariate analysis of effects of pretransplantation variables on 5-year overall and event-free survival rates

Fig. 3.

Overall survival of transplantation recipients in 1988‒1999 (period 1, n=57), 2000‒2009 (period 2, n=123), and 2010‒2016 (period 3, n=86).

Fig. 4.

Event-free survival of transplantation recipients in 1988‒1999 (period 1, n=57), 2000‒2009 (period 2, n=123), and 2010‒2016 (period 3, n=86).

4. Prognostic factors for transplant outcomes

From Univariate analysis, patients who underwent HSCT at age ≤10 years or with pre-HSCT SF ≤2,500 ng/mL had significantly better 5-year OS and EFS. Figs. 5 and 6 illustrate these outcomes stratified by age (≤10 vs. >10 years). Notably, a significant benefit of younger age was observed only in P1, not in P2 or P3. Pre-HSCT splenectomy was significantly associated with worse 5-year OS, whereas oral busulfan was linked to poorer 5-year EFS compared with intravenous busulfan (P value was marginally significant at P=0.08). However, the type of conditioning regimens (MAC vs. RIC) did not affect OS or EFS. Furthermore, patients receiving low CD34+ cell doses (≤3×106 cells/kg for BM or PB, and ≤3×105 cells/kg for cord blood) had significantly worse OS and EFS. Univariate analysis of these pre-HSCT variables affecting survival is summarized in Table 4. The subsequent multivariate analysis of these factors showed statistically significant adverse effects for the following 3 variables. Pre-HSCT SF > 2,500 ng/mL emerged as a negative predictor for both OS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04−7.61; P=0.04) and EFS (HR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.40−6.70; P<0.01). A low CD34+ cell dose was significantly detrimental to EFS (HR, 4.17; 95% CI, 1.82−9.09; P=0.01). Oral busulfan was also significantly associated with worse EFS (HR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.16−7.14; P=0.02).

Fig. 5.

Overall survival stratified by age (≤10 years, n=213 versus >10 years, n=53) at transplantation.

Fig. 6.

Event-free survival stratified by age (≤10 years, n=213 versus >10 years, n=53) at transplantation.

For factors affecting thalassemia recurrence, univariate (data not shown) and multivariate analyses were conducted, including age at HSCT, pre-HSCT spleen and liver size, splenectomy, pre-HSCT SF, donor type, stem cell source, oral versus intravenous busulfan, types of conditioning regimen, and CD34+ cell dose. Only a low CD34+ cell dose (BM and PB ≤3×106 cells/kg, cord blood ≤3×105 cells/kg) significantly increased recurrence risk (odds ratio, 4.74; 95% CI, 1.81−12.44; P=0.002). We analyzed DC results collected at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-HSCT. Only the mixed DC status at 1 and 3 months was significantly correlated with the risk of graft rejection leading to thalassemia recurrence (HR [95% CI], 54.26 [6.77−434.74], P<0.001 and 13.84 [2.53−75.56], P=0.002, respectively). Donor lymphocyte infusions were administered to 21 patients with mixed chimerism, ranging from 1−11 times.

5. Cohort of long-term survivors

We evaluated 211 patients who remained thalassemia-free for more than 2-year post-HSCT. The median follow-up time was 10.5 (range, 2−30) years. Of these, 48 (22.7%) experienced at least 1 late complication and 17 (8.1%) had mixed DC. The lowest DC observed in these survivors was 29.65% at 9-year post-HSCT. This patient was ex-Hb E/beta-thalassemia post MUD-HSCT. At the last follow-up, her Hb level was 8.8 g/dL without transfusion. Hb typing revealed Hb A 72.2, F 7.8, and E 13.5%.

Endocrine dysfunction was the most frequent late effect (28 patients, 58.3%), with a significantly higher incidence in P2 and P3 compared to P1 (18.4% vs. 13% vs. 2.6%) (P=0.01). The major endocrine manifestations included gonadal insufficiency (17 patients, 35.4%), hypothyroidism (10 patients, 20.8%), diabetes mellitus (4 patients, 8.3%), Hashimoto thyroiditis (1 patient), and toxic goiter (1 patient). Three patients developed 2 endocrine complications, and one had three. In the univariate analysis, patients with endocrine dysfunction were significantly older at HSCT, and those aged >10 years had a higher risk for these complications. RIC and acute GVHD grades 2–4 also showed a significant correlation with a higher risk of endocrine complications. The univariate analyses of pre-HSCT predictors for endocrine outcomes are summarized in Table 5. However, the subsequent multivariate analysis revealed that only acute GVHD grades 2–4 was significantly correlated with the risk of long-term endocrine complications (HR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.13−7.15; P=0.027).

Univariate analysis of pretransplantation predictors of long-term endocrine complications (n=211 survivors)

Late effects attributed to chronic GVHD occurred in 8 patients (16.7%). Bronchiolitis obliterans was the most common manifestation (5 patients, 10.4%), followed by scleroderma (3 patients, 6.3%), eye irritation, and esophageal stricture with malnutrition (1 patient each). Two patients presented with late-onset chronic GVHD symptoms.

Five patients (10.4%) developed autoimmune disorders, including autoimmune hemolytic anemia (2 patients), autoimmune hypothyroidism (2 patients), and Hashimoto thyroiditis (1 patient). Their HSCT types comprised 2 MRDs, 2 MUDs, and 1 MMUD. Three patients had full DC, and chimerism data were unavailable for the remaining 2. No malignancies were observed among ex-thalassemia survivors in this cohort.

Discussion

This study provides a comprehensive analysis of 266 HSCT outcomes in 249 pediatric TDT patients in Thailand over 30 years. The data concerning some of these HSCT cases were previously reported [8,13-15]. Our analysis revealed no significant difference between MRD-HSCT and MUDHSCT, with 5-year OS and EFS around 90% and 80%, respectively. This finding aligns with prior observations that, with stringent HLA matching, pre-HSCT immunosuppression and appropriate conditioning intensity in high-risk patients, and improved supportive care, MUD-HSCT can approximate MRD-HSCT outcomes [7,8,16-18]. The Thalassemia International Federation also recommends HLA-MUDs if MRDs are unavailable and emphasizes the importance of stringent HLA class I and II compatibility criteria to optimize outcomes [19]. A Chinese study supports this notion, reporting excellent outcomes in 48 children (aged 2−11 years) with TDT who underwent MUD-PB HSCT using cyclophosphamide/fludarabine/intravenous busulfan/antithymocyte globulin. All achieved donor engraftment, with OS and EFS of 100% at a median follow-up of 14 months, and the incidence of grades II−IV acute GVHD and chronic GVHD was 8.3% each [20]. Similarly, a South Indian study of 264 children with thalassemia major who underwent MRD- (78%) and MUD-HSCT (22%) reported a median follow-up of 65 months, with 93% receiving a MAC regimen comprising treosulfan/thiotepa/fludarabine and 61% receiving PBSC. In that study, the EFS and OS for MUD-HSCT were 84% and 87%; and matched sibling donor-HSCT were 94% and 95%, respectively. However, acute GVHD and chronic GVHD rates were high in MUD-HSCT (60% and 41%, respectively), likely reflecting PBSC predominance [21].

In our series, MUD-HSCT showed significantly higher rates of VOD and acute GVHD (Table 3). In addition, P2 and P3—which increased use of MUD, mismatched donors, and PBSC—also had higher incidences of VOD, acute GVHD, and chronic GVHD despite optimized GVHD prophylaxis for most MUD procedures; yet, these periods showed a lower rate of thalassemia recurrence (Tables 1 and 2). The elevated VOD incidence was likely due to the higher intensity conditioning and immunosuppressive drugs employed in MUD, mismatched donor, and PBSC settings. However, the higher incidence of GVHD may have been beneficial by mitigating the risk of thalassemia recurrence from graft rejection. Our 5-year OS and EFS are comparable to the multicenter EBMT hemoglobinopathy registry in 2000-2010 which results 2-year OS 88% and EFS 81% [3] and the Italian sibling cohorts which reported long-term 20-year OS 89.2% and EFS 85.7% [22]. Notably, our HLA-mis-MRD- and MMUD-HSCT outcomes (5-year OS and EFS) were more favorable than a prior report [7], possibly because our mismatched cases were few and involved only a single antigen or allele mismatch.

Older age at HSCT, commonly defined as ≥7 to ≥10 years, has been repeatedly associated with poorer outcomes in Asian, EBMT, and Italian studies. This is often attributed to a higher pre-HSCT transfusion load, a greater iron burden, and subsequent organ damage [3,5-8,21]. Our findings confirm this association in patients older than 10 years who underwent HSCT during the early period (P1), where younger recipients (≤10 years) showed significantly better 5-year OS and EFS. However, this age-related effect was not statistically significant in P2 and P3 (Table 4), highlighting an important observation that the negative impact of older age at the time of HSCT has become less pronounced in more recent periods. This supports the continuous evolution of risk models beyond fixed age cutoffs. Although MUD-HSCT was first introduced in P2 and the proportion of older children receiving transplants rose during P2 and P3, there was also a concomitant increase in the proportion of patients receiving regular transfusions and iron chelation which were known favorable factors for HSCT outcome. Furthermore, our study showed a decrease in pre-HSCT splenectomy over time. This reduction likely reflects our improvements in medical management, including early and adequate blood transfusions to minimize spleen enlargement. Additional advances after 2000 included refinements in HLA typing, widespread adoption of intravenous busulfan, greater use of fludarabine-based RIC and pre-HSCT immunosuppression for high-risk patients, and more robust post-HSCT supportive care. These collective improvements likely attenuated the adverse effect of older age observed in P1, resulting in more favorable outcomes for older children in the 2 later periods and better survival gains despite higher GVHD rates.

Irregular iron chelation has been identified as an independent prognostic factor in HSCT [4-6,19]. SF levels can serve as a noninvasive indicator of iron overload, although the optimal pre-HSCT cutoff remains uncertain. In our study, SF ≤ 2,500 ng/mL was significantly associated with better 5-year OS and EFS (Table 4), underscoring the importance of effective iron chelation and suggesting that SF ≤ 2,500 ng/mL may be an appropriate pre-HSCT target.

Although pre-HSCT splenectomy correlated with significantly lower OS in our study, this association did not reach statistical significance in multivariate analysis. A study by Mathews et al. [23] reported higher rates of peritransplant infectious deaths, lower EFS, and reduced OS in β-thalassemia major patients undergoing pre-HSCT splenectomy. Since no clear survival benefit emerged, routine pre-HSCT splenectomy for TDT is not recommended. Instead, increasing pretransfusion Hb levels to suppress ineffective erythropoiesis and reduce spleen size appears more beneficial.

Our findings also highlight the importance of CD34+ cell dose. Low CD34+ counts (≤3 ×106 cells/kg in BM or PB) were associated with worse EFS, stressing the need for adequate stem cell yields. The optimal target depends on various factors, including patient risk level, stem cell source, HSCT type, and conditioning regimen [8,14,24]. Our study underscores the critical importantance of monitoring early mixed DC during the first 3 months post-HSCT, as it correlates with thalassemia recurrence. This result supports previous research [25] showing that the progressive loss of DC in the initial 2 months is a vital signal for initiating pre-emptive interventions, including the tapering of immunosuppressive drugs or donor lymphocyte infusion. Nevertheless, ex-thalassemia patients who maintain persistent mixed DC beyond 2 years post-HSCT can establish reciprocal donor-recipient tolerance [26]. This allows for the production of sufficient Hb, leading to transfusion independence, similar to our survivor patients.

Long-term surveillance of pediatric TDT patients after HSCT has identified multiple late effects—such as chronic GVHD, endocrine dysfunction, growth retardation, autoimmune cytopenia, and secondary malignancies—that can compromise quality of life and increase morbidity and mortality [26-29]. In our cohort, 22.7% of 211 ex-thalassemia patients developed late complications. Endocrine dysfunction was most prevalent, particularly gonadal insufficiency. These findings mirror a previous study [28] that reported gonadal dysfunction (43.9%)—including azoospermia, primary amenorrhea, and secondary amenorrhea—as the most frequent late effect in TDT patients post-HSCT (median follow-up, 30 years). Thyroid disorders affected 18.6% of that population, with hypothyroidism at 10.6%. Potential causes for these endocrine issues include iron-induced tissue toxicity, iron chelator side effects, and conditioning regimens. However, we observed a higher incidence of endocrine late effects in our later cohort (P2 and P3) which was likely due to a greater incidence of acute GVHD during those periods. The correlation between acute GVHD (grades 2–4) and endocrine late effects (HR, 2.84; P=0.027), independent of conditioning regimens or age, suggests that acute, intense inflammatory events and the high-dose steroid treatment used to manage GVHD cause severe and lasting damage. Previous study [29] also indicated that iron overload, conditioning toxicity, and posttransplant complications (such as GVHD and treatment) influence late effects, including endocrinopathies. Our finding emphasizes the importantance of effective acute GVHD prophylaxis and treatment during HSCT and necessitates long-term multidisciplinary surveillance for all survivors. Secondary solid cancer was reported in 1.74%–12.2% of cases in previous studies [22,28], however we observed no malignancies in our cohort, potentially due to our shorter follow-up duration.

Autoimmune cytopenia was noted in 4.4% of post-HSCT TDT patients in a previous series [27], all of whom received MUD-HSCT. In our cohort, 5 cases (2.4%) developed autoimmune disorders, including 2 with autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Unlike the previous report, these cases occurred not only in MUD but also in MRD and MMUD transplants. The proposed mechanism involves disordered immune reconstitution of the newly adopted immune system, leading to aberrant interactions among antigen-presenting cells, T lymphocytes, B cells, and regulatory T cells [27]. These observations underscore the necessity of ongoing multidisciplinary follow-up for early detection and management of complications in ex-thalassemia patients.

Our multicenter HSCT experience in Thai pediatric TDT demonstrated survival rates comparable to international data (e.g., EBMT and Italian studies) [3,4,6,7]. However, resource limitations such as high procedure costs with no coverage from the National health care system, infrastructure constraints, limited national unrelated donor availability (The Thai National Stem Cell Donor Registry was established in 2002)—often necessitating reliance on costly international registries—, and the maintaining high-quality supportive care which is crucial for minimizing transplant-related mortality are challenging. Addressing equity and sustainability of HSCT in developing countries requires a strategic approach: prioritizing curative HSCT as it is more cost-effective than lifelong transfusion and chelation [30], and implementing national policies that secure sustainable funding. Thailand established this policy for thalassemia in 2020. The cost of HSCT for most patients in this cohort was covered by hospital funds.

The retrospective design of this study makes it susceptible to some limitations including incomplete data and the absence of standardized pre- and post-HSCT protocols across centers, which may have introduced variations in outcomes. Furthermore, specific post-HSCT data on growth and iron overload were not collected. Finally, the long-term outcomes are potentially compromised by selection bias due to patient loss to follow-up. Nonetheless, our findings highlight key factors that affect outcomes in pediatric TDT patients undergoing HSCT and suggest practical improvements in clinical care. These enhancements have contributed to the comparable results between MRD- and MUD-HSCT and have mitigated some of the adverse effects of older age at transplantation. Future investigations should employ prospective, multicenter designs with standardized protocols to validate these observations. Recent advances in gene therapy [31] hold promise for achieving transfusion independence in TDT, providing a potential adjunct or alternative to HSCT.

In conclusion, our results broaden the donor pool by demonstrating similar outcomes between MRD and MUD-HSCT. Rigorous pre-HSCT management of iron overload, the use of intravenous busulfan in conditioning, and ensuring adequate stem cell doses are fundamental to optimizing HSCT success. Careful pre-HSCT preparation is essential, particularly adequate blood transfusions to maintain adequate Hb levels to prevent splenomegaly and providing effective iron chelation. In addition, refined conditioning regimens, optimized GVHD prophylaxis, and robust post-HSCT supportive care can lessen the risks associated with older age at transplantation. Finally, a focused approach to monitoring late complications is crucial for long-term well-being in ex-TDT survivors.

Notes

Conflicts of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding

This work was supported by a research grant from The Thai Society of Hematology.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Professors Vinai Suvattee, Voravan S. Tanphaichit, Gavivann Veerakul, and Surapol Issaragrisil, who performed the first HSCT for a thalassemia patient in Thailand in 1988. We also thank the medical staff and nurses of all participating transplant centers for providing exemplary care to the patients. We thank Pimchanok Nareumitmingkon, M.D., for her valuable assistance in collecting part of the data on splenectomized patients at Siriraj Hospital. We are indebted to Sommaphun Tabjaroen (Thai Society of Hematology), Chotchana Photinil (Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University), and Julaporn Pooliam (Research Group and Research Network Division, Research Department, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital,Mahidol University) for their assistance with statistical analyses. This work was supported by a research grant from the Thai Society of Hematology.

Author contribution

Conceptualization: KS, SH; Formal Analysis: KS, KL, SH; Investigation: KS, KL, BP, NN, CT, UA, SP, SL, KC, TC, PS, PR, DS, NS, SH; Methodology: KS, SH; Project Administration: KS, SH; Writing – Original Draft: KS, KL, SH; Writing – Review & Editing: KS, KL, BP, NN, CT, UA, SP, SL, KC, TC, PS, PR, DS, NS, SH

References

1. Thomas ED, Buckner CD, Sanders JE, Papayannopoulou T, Borgna-Pignatti C, De Stefano P, et al. Marrow transplantation for thalassaemia. Lancet 1982;2:227–9.
2. Caocci G, Orofino MG, Vacca A, Piroddi A, Piras E, Addari MC, et al. Long-term survival of beta thalassemia major patients treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation compared with survival with conventional treatment. Am J Hematol 2017;92:1303–10.
3. Baronciani D, Angelucci E, Potschger U, Gaziev J, Yesilipek A, Zecca M, et al. Hemopoietic stem cell transplantation in thalassemia: a report from the European Society for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplantation Hemoglobinopathy Registry, 2000-2010. Bone Marrow Transplant 2016;51:536–41.
4. Lucarelli G, Galimberti M, Polchi P, Angelucci E, Baronciani D, Giardini C, et al. Bone marrow transplantation in patients with thalassemia. N Engl J Med 1990;322:417–21.
5. Mathews V, George B, Deotare U, Lakshmi KM, Viswabandya A, Daniel D, et al. A new stratification strategy that identifies a subset of class III patients with an adverse prognosis among children with beta thalassemia major undergoing a matched related allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2007;13:889–94.
6. Sabloff M, Chandy M, Wang Z, Logan BR, Ghavamzadeh A, Li CK, et al. HLA-matched sibling bone marrow transplantation for β-thalassemia major. Blood 2011;117:1745–50.
7. Li C, Mathews V, Kim S, George B, Hebert K, Jiang H, et al. Related and unrelated donor transplantation for β-thalassemia major: results of an international survey. Blood Adv 2019;3:2562–70.
8. Anurathapan U, Pakakasama S, Mekjaruskul P, Sirachainan N, Songdej D, Chuansumrit A, et al. Outcomes of thalassemia patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation by using a standard myeloablative versus a novel reduced-toxicity conditioning regimen according to a new risk stratification. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2014;20:2066–71.
9. Vassal G, Michel G, Espérou H, Gentet JC, Valteau-Couanet D, Doz F, et al. Prospective validation of a novel IV busulfan fixed dosing for paediatric patients to improve therapeutic AUC targeting without drug monitoring. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2008;61:113–23.
10. Glucksberg H, Storb R, Fefer A, Buckner CD, Neiman PE, Clift RA, et al. Clinical manifestations of graft-versus-host disease in human recipients of marrow from HL-A-matched sibling donors. Transplantation 1974;18:295–304.
11. Lee SJ, Flowers ME. Recognizing and managing chronic graft-versus-host disease. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2008;:134–41.
12. Carreras E, Díaz-Beyá M, Rosiñol L, Martínez C, Fernández-Avilés F, Rovira M. The incidence of veno-occlusive disease following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has diminished and the outcome improved over the last decade. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2011;17:1713–20.
13. Hongeng S, Pakakasama S, Chuansumrit A, Sirachainan N, Kitpoka P, Udomsubpayakul U, et al. Outcomes of transplantation with related- and unrelated-donor stem cells in children with severe thalassemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2006;12:683–7.
14. Sanpakit K, Pongtanakul B, Narkbunnam N, Viprakasit V, Veerakul G, Tanphaichitr VS, et al. How can we get the best outcomes from cord blood stem cell transplantation in severe thalassemic patients: when does the cell number really matter? Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2017;48:192–201.
15. Sanpakit K, Narkbunnam N, Buaboonnam J, Takpradit C, Viprakasit V, Pongtanakul B. Impact of splenectomy on outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in pediatric patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2020;67e28483.
16. La Nasa G, Argiolu F, Giardini C, Pession A, Fagioli F, Caocci G, et al. Unrelated bone marrow transplantation for beta-thalassemia patients: the experience of the Italian Bone Marrow Transplant Group. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2005;1054:186–95.
17. Shenoy S, Thompson AA. Unrelated donor stem cell transplantation for transfusion-dependent thalassemia. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2016;1368:122–6.
18. Li C, Wu X, Feng X, He Y, Liu H, Pei F, et al. A novel conditioning regimen improves outcomes in β-thalassemia major patients using unrelated donor peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Blood 2012;120:3875–81.
19. Sodani P, Oevermann L. Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for thalassaemia. In: Cappellini MD, Farmakis D, Porter J, Taher A, editors. 2021 Guidelines for the management of transfusion dependent thalassemia (TDT). 4th ed (Version 2.0). Cyprus: Thalassemia International Federation, 2021:268-77.
20. Sun L, Wang N, Chen Y, Tang L, Xing C, Lu N, et al. Unrelated donor peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for patients with β-thalassemia major based on a novel conditioning regimen. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019;25:1592–6.
21. Swaminathan VV, Uppuluri R, Patel S, Ravichandran N, Ramanan KM, Vaidhyanathan L, et al. Matched family versus alternative donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with thalassemia major: experience from a tertiary referral center in South India. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2020;26:1326–31.
22. Di Bartolomeo P, Santarone S, Di Bartolomeo E, Olioso P, Bavaro P, Papalinetti G, et al. Long-term results of survival in patients with thalassemia major treated with bone marrow transplantation. Am J Hematol 2008;83:528–30.
23. Mathews V, George B, Lakshmi KM, Viswabandya A, John JM, Sitaram U, et al. Impact of pretransplant splenectomy on patients with beta-thalassemia major undergoing a matched-related allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2009;13:171–6.
24. Angelucci E, Matthes-Martin S, Baronciani D, Bernaudin F, Bonanomi S, Cappellini MD, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in thalassemia major and sickle cell disease: indications and management recommendations from an international expert panel. Haematologica 2014;99:811–20.
25. Lucarelli G, Andreani M, Angelucci E. The cure of thalassemia by bone marrow transplantation. Blood Rev 2002;16:81–5.
26. Andreani M, Nesci S, Lucarelli G, Tonucci P, Rapa S, Angelucci E, et al. Long-term survival of ex-thalassemic patients with persistent mixed chimerism after bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000;25:401–4.
27. Oikonomopoulou C, Paisiou A, Komitopoulou A, Ioannidou ED, Kaisari A, Tzannou I, et al. Increased incidence of autoimmune cytopenias after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation using a matched unrelated donor in children with β-thalassaemia. Br J Haematol 2021;192e127. –9.
28. Santarone S, Angelini S, Natale A, Vaddinelli D, Spadano R, Casciani P, et al. Survival and late effects of hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with thalassemia major. Bone Marrow Transplant 2022;57:1689–97.
29. Rahal I, Galambrun C, Bertrand Y, Garnier N, Paillard C, Frange P, et al. Late effects after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for β-thalassemia major: the French national experience. Haematologica 2018;103:1143–9.
30. Leelahavarong P, Chaikledkaew U, Hongeng S, Kasemsup V, Lubell Y, Teerawattananon Y. A cost-utility and budget impact analysis of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe thalassemic patients in Thailand. BMC Health Serv Res 2010;10:209.
31. Malay J, Salama RA, Alam Qureshi GS, Ammar AR, Janardhan G, Safdar M, et al. Gene therapy: a revolutionary step in treating thalassemia. Hematol Rep 2024;16:656–68.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

Overall survival of related (n=200) versus unrelated (n=66) donor transplantation recipients.

Fig. 2.

Event-free survival of related (n=200) versus unrelated (n=66) donor transplantation recipients.

Fig. 3.

Overall survival of transplantation recipients in 1988‒1999 (period 1, n=57), 2000‒2009 (period 2, n=123), and 2010‒2016 (period 3, n=86).

Fig. 4.

Event-free survival of transplantation recipients in 1988‒1999 (period 1, n=57), 2000‒2009 (period 2, n=123), and 2010‒2016 (period 3, n=86).

Fig. 5.

Overall survival stratified by age (≤10 years, n=213 versus >10 years, n=53) at transplantation.

Fig. 6.

Event-free survival stratified by age (≤10 years, n=213 versus >10 years, n=53) at transplantation.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of patients and HSCTs by transplantation period

Variable Total The year of HSCT
P value
1988–1999 2000–2009 2010–2016
No. of HSCTs 266 (100) 57 (21.4) 123 (46.3) 86 (32.3) NA
Age at HSCT (yr) 6.9 (1.0–19.0) 4.0 (1.0–14.0) 7.0 (1.0–18.0) 7.2 (1.0–19.0) <0.001
Age at HSCT (yr) 0.03
 ≤10 213 (80.1) 52 (91.2) 100 (81.3) 61 (70.9)
 >10 53 (19.9) 5 (8.8) 23 (18.7) 25 (29.1)
Diagnosis 0.21
 Hb E/beta-thalassemia 202 (75.9) 39 (68.4) 96 (78.0) 67 (77.9)
 Beta-thalassemia major 61 (22.9) 18 (31.6) 27 (22.0) 16 (18.7)
 Hb Bart's hydrops 1 (0.4) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (1.1)
 Hb H/Hb Pak Nam Po 1 (0.4) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (1.1)
 Hb H/Hb Sun Prairie 1 (0.4) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (1.1)
Pre-HSCT liver size below costal margin (cm) 0.19
 ≤2 205 (77.0) 49 (86.0) 91 (74.0) 65 (76.0)
 >2 61 (22.9) 8 (14.0) 32 (26.0) 21 (24.0)
Pre-HSCT or presplenectomy spleen size below costal margin (cm) 4 (0, 20) 2 (0, 20) 1 (0, 8) 1 (0, 10) <0.01
No. of pre-HSCT splenectomized patients 38 (14.3) 12 (21.0) 20 (16.0) 6 (7.0) 0.03
No. of patients receiving pre-HSCT regular transfusion 246 (92.5) 44 (77.0) 117 (95.0) 85 (99.0) <0.01
Pre-HSCT serum ferritin (ng/mL) 1,728 (58–8,350) 1,105 (600–2,800) 1,670 (58–8,350) 1,788 (315–6,380) 0.72
No. of patients receiving pre-HSCT iron chelation 151/215 (70.2) 22/47 (46.8) 61/91 (67.0) 68/77 (88.0) <0.01
Donor type
 HLA-matched related 191 (71.8) 56 (98.2) 86 (70.0) 49 (57.0) <0.01
 HLA-matched unrelated 59 (22.2) 0 (0) 33 (26.8) 26 (30.2) <0.01
 HLA-mismatched related 9 (3.4) 1 (1.8) 2 (1.6) 6 (7.0) NA
 HLA-mismatched unrelated 7 (2.6) 0 (0) 2 (1.6) 5 (5.8) NA
Source of stem cells
 Bone marrowa) 185 (69.5) 44 (77.2) 88 (71.5) 53 (61.6) 0.11
 Peripheral bloodb) 61 (22.9) 1 (1.8) 27 (22.0) 33 (38.4) <0.01
 Cord blood 20 (7.5) 12 (21.0) 8 (6.5) 0 (0) NA
Conditioning regimens <0.01
 Bu/Cy±ATG 194 (73.0) 57 (100) 86 (70.0) 51 (59.3)
 FA/Bu/Cy±ATG 32 (12.0) 0 (0) 16 (13.0) 16 (18.6)
 FA/Bu/ATG±Melphalan 34 (12.8) 0 (0) 15 (12.2) 19 (22.1)
 FA/Bu/ATG/Thiotepa/LI 1 (0.4) 0 (0) 1 (0.8) 0 (0)
 Treosulfan/Cy 3 (1.1) 0 (0) 3 (2.4) 0 (0)
 Unknown 2 (0.7) 0 (0) 2 (1.6) 0 (0)
GVHD prophylaxis <0.01
 Calcineurin inhibitor 18 (6.8) 7 (12.3) 10 (8.1) 1 (1.2)
 Calcineurin inhibitor/MTX 205 (77.0) 50 (87.7) 90 (73.2) 65 (75.6)
 Calcineurin inhibitor/MMF±MTX 42 (15.8) 0 (0) 22 (17.9) 20 (23.2)
 Unknown 1 (0.4) 0 (0) 1 (0.8) 0 (0)
No. of CD34 (cells/kg)
 Bone marrow (×106) 5.8 (1.0–31.0) 3.6 (2.9–4.8) 6.2 (1.0–31.0) 5.7 (1.2–17.7) 0.24
 Peripheral blood (×106) 9.2 (2.0–27.4) 6.7 (6.7–6.7) 8.7 (2.0–27.4) 10.1 (3.3–27.2) 0.16
 Cord blood (×105) 3.0 (1.3–11.7) 3.3 (1.9–11.7) 2.34 (1.3–5.8) - NA

Values are presented as number of HSCTs (%) or median (range).

HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; Hb, hemoglobin; Hb H, hemoglobin H disease; pre-HSCT, pre-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; Bu, busulfan; Cy, cyclophosphamide; ATG, antithymocyte globulin; FA, fludarabine; LI, lymphoid irradiation; GVHD, graft-versus-host disease; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; MTX, methotrexate; NA, not applicable (too few patients for a reliable analysis).

a)

Including cord blood combined with bone marrow in 3 patients and peripheral blood followed by bone marrow in 1 patient from the same donor.

b)

Including bone marrow followed by peripheral blood in 4 patients from the same donors.

Boldface indicates a statistically significant difference with P≤0.05.

Table 2.

Outcomes after HSCT stratified by transplantation period

Variable Total The year of HSCTs
P value
1988–1999 2000–2009 2010–2016
No. of HSCTs 266 57 123 86
No. of days post-HSCT
 RBC transfusion independence 28 (9–175) 23 (12–57) 28 (9–107) 44 (10–175) <0.01
 Neutrophil engraftment 16 (7–52) 19 (8–34) 15 (7–42) 16 (8–52) 0.06
 Platelet engraftment 28 (9–323) 23 (10–55) 27 (9–323) 34 (11–94) 0.37
Veno-occlusive disease 33 (12.4) 2 (3.5) 20 (16.2) 11 (12.8) 0.043
 Mild 18 (6.8) 1 (1.7) 12 (9.8) 5 (5.8)
 Moderate 12 (4.5) 1 (1.7) 5 (4.0) 6 (7.0)
 Severe 3 (1.1) 0 (0) 3 (2.4) 0 (0)
Acute GVHD
 All grades 71 (26.7) 4 (7.0) 33 (26.8) 34 (39.5) <0.01
 ≥Grade 2 48 (18) 4 (7.0) 23 (18.7) 21 (24.4) 0.02
Chronic GVHD 39 (14.7) 1 (1.8) 25 (20.3) 13 (15.1) <0.01
 Mild 14 (5.3) 1 (1.8) 7 (5.7) 6 (7.0)
 Moderate 18 (6.8) 0 (0) 12 (9.8) 6 (7.0)
 Severe 7 (2.6) 0 (0) 6 (4.8) 1 (1.1)
Thalassemia recurrence 31 (11.6) 13 (22.8) 11 (8.9) 7 (8.1)
No. of deaths 24 (9.0) 6 (10.5) 12 (9.8) 6 (7.0) 0.7
Duration post-HSCT to death (mo) 5.2 (0.1–100.6) 1.7 (0.2–11.9) 7.5 (0.1–100.6) 4.4 (0.2–11.5) 0.43

Values are presented as number of HSCTs (%) or median (range).

GVHD, graft-versus-host disease; RBC, red blood cell; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Boldface indicates a statistically significant difference with P≤0.05.

Table 3.

Characteristics and outcomes of HSCT (2000–2016) by donor type

Variable Total Types of HSCT
P value
Matched related donor Matched unrelated donor
No. of HSCTs 194 135 (69.6) 59 (30.4)
Sources of stem cell 0.71
 Bone marrow 134 92 (68.1) 42 (71.2)
 Peripheral blood 53 37 (27.4) 16 (27.1)
 Cord blood 7 6 (4.4) 1 (1.7)
Age at HSCT (yr) 7.0 7.0 (1.0–19.0) 7.0 (1.0–15.0) 0.35
Age at HSCT (yr) 0.71
 ≤10 149 (76.8) 105 (77.8) 44 (74.6)
 >10 45 (23.2) 30 (22.2) 15 (25.4)
No. of days post-HSCT
 RBC transfusion independence 33 (9–175) 33.5 (9–175) 29 (12–107) 0.25
 Neutrophil engraftment 15 (7–52) 15 (8–52) 17 (7–41) 0.14
 Platelet engraftment 28 (9–323) 28 (9–71) 27 (10–323) 0.91
Veno-occlusive disease 27 (14.2) 13 (9.9) 14 (23.7) 0.015
 Mild 15 (7.9) 9 (6.9) 6 (10.2)
 Moderate 10 (5.3) 4 (3.1) 6 (10.2)
 Severe 2 (1.1) 0 (0) 2 (3.4)
Acute GVHD
 All grades 62 (40.0) 31 (29.5) 31 (62.0) <0.001
 ≥Grade 2 39 (23.8) 20 (18.2) 19 (35.2) 0.02
Chronic GVHD 36 (22.8) 24 (22.6) 12 (23.1) 1.00
 Mild 13 (8.2) 9 (8.5) 4 (7.7)
 Moderate 16 (10.1) 12 (11.3) 4 (7.7)
 Severe 7 (4.4) 3 (2.8) 4 (7.7)
Thalassemia recurrence 17 (8.8) 9 (6.7) 8 (13.6) 0.166
No. of deaths 18 (9.3) 10 (7.4) 8 (13.6) 0.091

Values are presented as number of HSCTs (%) or median (range).

HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; RBC, red blood cell; GVHD, graft-versus-host disease.

Boldface indicates a statistically significant difference with P≤0.05.

Table 4.

Univariate analysis of effects of pretransplantation variables on 5-year overall and event-free survival rates

Variable No. 5-Year overall survival
5-Year event-free survival
Survival HR (95% CI) P value Survival HR (95% CI) P value
All data 266 91.3 NA NA 81.0 NA NA
Stem cell type
 BM 185 91.8 1 80.3 1
 PB 61 93.3 0.71 (0.24–2.12) 0.54 88.5 0.59 (0.27–1.26) 0.17
 CB 20 80.0 1.26 (0.29–5.50) 0.76 65.0 1.71 (0.72–4.06) 0.22
Donor type
 Related 200 91.9 1 81.8 1
 Unrelated 66 89.3 1.65 (0.69–3.94) 0.26 78.7 1.21 (0.66–2.22) 0.53
Year at HSCT
 1988–1999 57 89.4 1 67.7 1
 2000–2009 123 90.9 1.11 (0.36–3.43) 0.86 82.9 0.48 (0.26–0.92) 0.03
 2010–2016 86 93.0 0.80 (0.23–2.83) 0.73 87.2 0.37 (0.17–0.78) 0.01
Age at HSCT dividing by the time of HSCT
 Total 1988–2016 266
  ≤10 213 93.4 1 82.3 1
  >10 53 84.8 2.77 (1.18–6.48) 0.02 71.1 1.88 (1.04–3.40) 0.04
 Period 1: 1988–1999 57
  ≤10 52 95.1 1 70.0 1
  >10 5 60.0 10.73 (1.47–78.44) 0.02 0 5.03 (1.57–16.13) 0.01
 Period 2: 2000–2009 123
  ≤10 100 91.8 1 82.9 1
  >10 23 86.4 1.91 (0.57–6.33) 0.29 77.3 1.37 (0.54–3.47) 0.51
 Period 3: 2010–2016 86
  ≤10 61 95.0 1 89.7 1
  >10 25 88.0 2.79 (0.56–13.84) 0.21 80.0 2.99 (0.97–9.29) 0.06
SF (ng/mL) N=166
 ≤2,500 128 92.07 1 85.91 1
 >2,500 38 81.58 2.63 (1.00–6.92) 0.05 71.05 2.13 (1.03–4.42) 0.04
Splenectomy
 No 228 92.81 1 81.64 1
 Yes 38 81.49 2.64 (1.08–6.43) 0.04 78.86 1.03 (0.46–2.29) 0.95
Liver size below costal margin (cm) N=123
 ≤2 62 88.52 1 77.35 1
 >2 61 90.05 1.55 (0.62–3.90) 0.35 80.11 1.30 (0.69–2.43) 0.42
Busulfan N=261
 Oral 131 90.01 1 76.12 1
 Intravenous 130 92.96 0.69 (0.29–1.64) 0.41 86.14 0.60 (0.34–1.06) 0.08
Conditioning regimens N=264
 MAC 232 91.74 1 87.63 1
 RIC 32 90.32 1.07 (0.32,3.59) 0.92 87.39 1.09 (3.08–3.13) 0.88
No. of CD34 (cells/kg) N=204
 -BM and PB ≤3×106 36 86.1 1 63.5 1
 CB ≤3×105
 -BM and PB >3×106 168 92.7 0.37 (0.14–0.98) 0.05 88.1 0.29 (0.15–0.57) <0.001
 CB >3×105

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; NA, not applicable; BM, bone marrow; PB, peripheral blood; CB, cord blood; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; SF, serum ferritin; MAC, myeloablative conditioning regimen; N, number of HSCT procedures; RIC, reduced-intensity conditioning regimen.

Boldface indicates a statistically significant difference with P≤0.05.

Table 5.

Univariate analysis of pretransplantation predictors of long-term endocrine complications (n=211 survivors)

Variable Endocrine complications
P value OR (95% CI) P value
No (N=182) Yes (N=29)
Age at HSCT (yr) 6.0 (1.0–18.8) 8.0 (1.0–19.0) 0.01 NA NA
Age at HSCT (yr)
 ≤10 154 (84.6) 19 (65.5) 0.01 1 -
 >10 Y 28 (15.4) 10 (34.5) - 2.90 (1.22–6.88) 0.02
Serum ferritin (ng/mL) 1,675 (58–4,940) 2,087 (831–8,350) 0.18 NA NA
 ≤2,500 94 (80.3) 15 (83.3) 1 1 -
 >2,500 23 (19.7) 3 (16.7) - 0.82 (0.22–3.06) 0.77
Type of donors
 Related 139 (76.4) 22 (75.9) 0.95 1 -
 Unrelated 43 (23.6) 7 (24.1) - 1.03 (0.41–2.57) 0.95
Bulsulfan
 Oral 89 (49.4) 9 (33.3) 0.149 1 -
 Intravenous 91 (50.6) 18 (28.6) - 1.96 (0.84–4.59) 0.12
Conditioning regimens
 MAC 165 (90.7) 20 (71.4) 0.008 1 -
 RIC 17 (9.1) 8 (28.6) - 3.88 (1.49–10.14) 0.006
Acute GVHD
 None and grade 1 147 (83.5) 17 (63.0) 0.018 1 -
 Grades 2–4 29 (16.5) 10 (37.0) - 2.98 (1.24–7.17) 0.015
Chronic GVHD
 No 156 (86.2) 21 (75.0) 0.156 1 -
 Yes 25 (13.8) 7 (25.0) - 2.08 (0.80–5.40) 0.132

Values are presented as number (%) or median (range) unless otherwise indicated.

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; NA, not applicable; MAC, myeloablative conditioning regimen; RIC, reducedintensity conditioning regimen; GVHD, graft-versus-host disease.

Boldface indicates a statistically significant difference with P≤0.05.