Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/pediatrics/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2025-05.txt) [function.fopen]: failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/virtual/pediatrics/journal/ip_info/view_data.php on line 93

Warning: fwrite(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /home/virtual/pediatrics/journal/ip_info/view_data.php on line 94
Serum bactericidal activity against meningococcus in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Volume 68(5); May

< Previous     Next >

Article Contents

Clin Exp Pediatr > Volume 68(5); 2025
Lee, Kim, Lee, and Kim: Serum bactericidal activity against meningococcus in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Abstract

Background

Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are susceptible to infectious diseases owing to various immunosuppressive treatments and disease characteristics. Meningococcal infections progress rapidly with a high incidence of severe complications and mortality; therefore, meningococcal vaccination is needed. However, there is limited evidence regarding the immunity and immunogenicity of patients with SLE.

Purpose

This study aimed to analyze the serum bactericidal activity against meningococci in patients with SLE in 2 domestic institutions in Korea.

Methods

Serum samples were collected from patients diagnosed with SLE (age <19 years) at Seoul National University Children's Hospital and Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital in 2016–2018. Serum bactericidal activity against the 4 meningococcal serogroups was analyzed using a serum bactericidal assay with rabbit serum. The patients' demographic information, diagnostic history, and disease activity status were obtained from electronic medical records.

Results

The mean age of the 41 included patients was 20.3±5.4 years (range, 10–35 years). All but one patient received steroids. The sera of most of the patients (34 of 41 [82.9%]) lacked bactericidal activity against serogroup A. Some patients showed bactericidal activity against serogroups C, W-135, and Y (63.4%, 56.1%, and 61.0%, respectively). There were no significant differences in the geometric mean indices based on complement consumption state or anti-double-stranded DNA antibody positivity.

Conclusion

Although the sera of some patients exhibited serum bactericidal activity against meningococci, most remained seronegative. It is important that patients with SLE at risk of meningococcal infection receive appropriate vaccinations. Our findings serve as baseline serological data for meningococcal vaccination policies for patients with SLE.

Graphical abstract. In this study, serum bactericidal activity against the 4 meningococcal serogroups was measured in adolescents and young adults with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Scatter plot of the serum bactericidal indices (SBIs) and seropositivity rates for meningococcal serogroups in patients with SLE. Each dot represents the SBIs and the bar height indicates the seropositivity rate for each serogroup. Although some patients exhibited serum bactericidal activity against meningococci, most patients remained seronegative.

Introduction

Infection in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality [1,2]. The protective immune function against bacteria, viruses, and fungi is impaired in patients with SLE, and they frequently develop opportunistic or serious infections. Serious infections are associated with mortality and occur in 11–45% of patients with SLE [3].
The lack of complements, defective pathogen phagocytosis, and inappropriately balanced levels of pro- and antiinflammatory cytokines are mainly responsible for the vulnerability to infection of patients with SLE [4,5]. Impaired immune activity cannot control the spread of pathogens and remove them, which results in persistent and worsening of infections. The manifestations and severity of SLE are dependent on the degree of uncontrolled autoimmune response or tissue invasion, which affects the defense immunity of patients.
Concomitant with intrinsic immune dysregulation, patients have an increased susceptibility to infection with respect to treatment. The use of immunosuppressive drugs, such as glucocorticoids (GCs), improves the prognosis of patients with SLE by preventing severe inflammation that either threatens their lives or causes organ damage. Although immunosuppressive therapy is effective and essential in controlling disease activity, it is associated with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, osteoporosis, and infection in patients with SLE [6,7]. Using GCs increases the infection risk of patients; however, some studies have reported no significant effects brought upon by GCs [8-12]. Hydroxychloroquine controls disease activity, prevents flare-ups or serious manifestations of the disease, including nephritis, and reduces serious infections in patients with SLE [3,13]. Several studies on the relationships between several immunosuppressive agents and infections in SLE have reported that using several immunosuppressive agents, including mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, did not involve a significant risk of infection and mortality [9]. Given these inconsistent reports, there is a need for clinicians to obtain evidence from real-world clinical practice.
Meningococcal infections span a wide spectrum of clinical presentations, ranging from transient fever to severe shock, and the complement system is crucial in defending against meningococcal infections [14]. The complement profile of patients with SLE closely mimics that of inherited complement deficiencies; thus, immunoglobulin deficiency and defects in chemotaxis and phagocytic activity may contribute to the increased susceptibility of patients with SLE to meningococcal infections [14,15].
This study aimed to investigate the immunological status of meningococci in adolescent and young patients with SLE.

Methods

1. Participants and study design

Patients with childhood-onset SLE who visited a tertiary medical center between January 2016 and December 2018 were identified. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) fulfillment of the 1997 American College of Rheumatology revised classification criteria for SLE,16) (2) diagnosis before 19 years of age, and (3) treatment and follow-up at 2 tertiary medical centers (Ewha Womans Mokdong Hospital and Seoul National University Children’s Hospital). The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) history of invasive meningococcal diseases, (2) received immunoglobulin within 3 months to one year before enrollment according to the dose and route, and (3) received antibiotics within 7 days before inclusion in the study. The medical records of these patients were retrospectively reviewed. The age of onset was defined as the age at the first clinical manifestation of SLE. Demographic characteristics, disease duration, and recent medications were also collected. Blood was drawn from each patient, and the complete blood count and inflammatory markers, including erythrocyte sedimentation rate, complement concentration, and anti-double stranded DNA antibody (anti-dsDNA Ab), were measured at enrollment.

2. Serum bactericidal assay for assessing immunogenicity

Serum bactericidal assays using baby rabbit complement (rSBAs) were performed for 4 meningococcal serogroups (A, C, W-135, and Y) at the Ewha Center for Vaccine Evaluation and Study as recommended by the World Health Organization in the standardized assay [17,18]. The target strains used for the rSBAs included ATCC13077 for serogroup A, C11 for serogroup C, MOI-240070 for serogroup W-135, and S-1975 for serogroup Y. ATCC13077 was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Rockville, MD, USA); MOI-240070 was purchased from the National Collection of Type Cultures (Public Health England, Salisbury, UK); C11 was provided by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals (Rixensart, Belgium); and Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics (Cambridge, MA, USA). S-1975 was provided by the US Food and Drug Administration (Silver Spring, MD, USA).
All rSBA procedures were performed in a Class II biosafety cabinet. A frozen aliquot of the N. meningitidis strain from each serogroup was thawed and diluted in Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) containing 1% horse serum (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA) to yield 800–1,000 colony-forming units in 20 μL of solution. Duplicate serum samples were serially diluted threefold with buffer in 96-well U-bottom microtiter plates. Subsequently, 20 μL of meningococcal suspension was added to the serially diluted serum. After 2 minutes of incubation at 25°C with shaking at 700 rpm, 20 μL of baby rabbit complement (Pelfreeze, Brown Deer, WI, USA) was added to each well. The plates were incubated for 90 min (serogroup A) or 60 min (serogroups C, W-135, and Y) in a tissue culture incubator (37°C, 5% CO2) with shaking at 700 rpm. After stopping the reaction by placing the plates on ice for 15 min, we spotted 10 μL of the final reaction mixture onto 1.5% of Brain-Heart-Infusion (Becton Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD, USA) agar plates with 5% horse serum. After the fluid was absorbed onto the agar, each plate was overlaid with molten Brain-Heart-Infusion agar (0.75%) containing 5% horse serum and 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The plates were incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. We counted the surviving bacterial colonies in the plates using the colony counting software National Institute of Standards and Technology, US Integrated Colony Enumerator (Gaithersburg, MD, USA). We defined the bactericidal index as the serum dilution that killed 50% of the bacteria, as determined by linear interpolation. For computational purposes, an rSBA index (rSBI) lower than the serum starting dilution of 8 was assigned a value of 4.

3. Correlates of protection measurements

An rSBI value ≥8 was used for correlates of protection measurements because it is a putative protective titer that predicts short-term clinical protection against disease in the United Kingdom [19]. Moreover, we used the more discriminatory rSBI value of ≥128, which reliably predicts serum bactericidal assays using human complement index ≥4 [20].

4. Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the patient characteristics, laboratory test results, and medication use. Categorical variables are presented as frequency counts, proportion percentages, and confidence intervals (CIs). We calculated the 95% CIs of the point estimates using the exact binomial distribution (Clopper-Pearson method) for proportions. For geometric mean indices (GMIs), we calculated the mean and 95% CIs on Log10 (titers/data) for a normal distribution; moreover, we applied antilog transformations. Because the GMIs were highly skewed, between-group comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Between-group comparisons of seropositivity prevalence were performed using the chi-square test, as appropriate. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. Seropositive was defined by a serum bactericidal index (SBI) ≥8 or ≥128. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 23.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA).

5. Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital (EUMC 2015-09-043, 2020-05-022) and Seoul National University Children’s Hospital (No. 1711-106-901).

Results

1. Demographic characteristics of the participants

A total of 41 patients were included in this analysis. Table 1 presents the general characteristics, age at diagnosis, laboratory findings, and medications of the patients with childhood-onset SLE. The laboratory findings and medication information were based on the test results at the time of serum bactericidal activity measurement. Most patients were female (35, 85.4%), and the mean age was 20.3±5.4 years. The mean disease duration was 6.8±5.2 years. Most patients received GCs (39, 95.1%), while 85.4% and 73.2% of patients frequently used hydroxychloroquine and other immunosuppressive drugs, respectively. One patient was not receiving any immunosuppressive medication, and 3 patients were on low-dose GC or hydroxychloroquine monotherapy. The remaining 37 patients were receiving combination therapy with 2 or more medications. None of the patients had any history of meningococcal vaccination.

2. Serum bactericidal activities against meningococci

Table 2 presents the seropositivity and GMIs of the 4 meningococcal serogroups. All SBIs against the 4 meningococci in the patients are shown in a scatter plot (Fig. 1). Most patients (34 of 41, 82.9%) lacked serum bactericidal activity against serogroup A, except for 7 patients who had high SBI titers against serogroup A. Some patients showed serum bactericidal activity against serogroups C, W-135, and Y (63.4%, 56.1%, and 61.0%, respectively). There were no significant between-group differences in the seropositivity rate when SBI ≥128 was used as the cutoff for the protective level to reduce the effect of the complement source.
We assessed the differences in the GMI according to the laboratory findings related to disease activity (C3 <83 mg/dL, C4 <15 mg/dL, and anti-dsDNA Ab >7 IU). In the standardized SBA method used to evaluate IgG antibodies induced by the vaccine, the influence of the patient's complement system is excluded as the assay utilizes an external complement source (from healthy individuals or rabbits), meaning the patient's complement deficiency is not reflected in the SBA. However, we analyzed the data to explore potential differences based on the patient's disease activity. For this purpose, we examined the GMIs of the subanalysis group based on laboratory findings related to disease activity, including C3 levels below 83 mg/dL, C4 levels below 15 mg/dL, and anti-dsDNA antibody levels above 7 IU (Fig. 2). No significant differences in GMIs were observed according to complement consumption state or anti-dsDNA antibody positivity. Patients who received higher GC doses (>7.5 mg/day prednisolone-equivalent) did not show significantly lower GMI titers. Finally, there was no linear correlation between the complement levels and SBIs of patients.

Discussion

We evaluated serum bactericidal activity against 4 meningococcal serogroups using sera from adolescents and young adults with SLE in Korea. Most patients were seronegative for serogroup A, whereas half of them were seronegative for the other 3 serogroups. There were no significant differences in disease activity or corticosteroid use.
The complement system is crucial in the defense against meningococcal infections [14]. Meningococcal infections are strongly associated with deficiencies in C3, properdin, and late complement components [21]. The complement profile in patients with SLE is largely similar to that of inherited complement deficiencies and defective splenic clearance of particulate immune complexes in patients with SLE [15]. Patients with active SLE have low circulating levels of complement components C3 and C4, which cause defective opsonization of immune complexes and saturation of immune complexes in the reticuloendothelial system (RES). Therefore, patients with SLE may be at risk for organisms whose removal is dependent on RES activity or complement opsonization [14]. Immunoglobulin deficiency, as well as defects in chemotaxis and phagocytic activity, may be involved in the increased susceptibility of patients with SLE to infection [14,15]. In some report, the proportion of patients with complement deficiencies diagnosed with meningococcal disease who had underlying conditions such as SLE and membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) was similar to those with inherited complement deficiencies. Of 20 patients presenting with their first episode of invasive meningococcal disease, 6 had low complement activity. Of these patients, 3 had acquired defects associated with either SLE or multiple myeloma [22]. Furthermore, Garty et al. [23] found that three of 30 patients with invasive meningococcal disease in Israel between 1970 and 1989 had complement deficiencies; 2 of these patients had SLE and MPGN. Reports by Feliciano et al. and Mitchell et al. further supported an association between SLE and meningococcal disease [14,21]. Despite various immunological aspects regarding susceptibility to infection in patients with SLE, cases of SLE-related Neisseria meningitidis infection remain scarce [14,15,24]. Only a few cases of SLE-related meningococcal infections have been reported; moreover, these patients often had chronic SLE and were undergoing corticosteroid treatment [21]. In this study, some patients with SLE lacked serum bactericidal activity. However, this should be interpreted through comparison with healthy individuals to determine infection susceptibility in patients with SLE.
There is limited evidence regarding the epidemiology of bactericidal antibodies against meningococci in Korea. Our findings can be compared to those reported for healthy Korean people (one and 4 reports regarding seroepidemiology and immunogenicity, respectively) (Table 3) [25-29]. Although these studies used different complement sources, bacterial strains, and laboratories, these studies reported relatively high seropositivity rates in adolescents and young Korean adults. In our study, the lowest seropositivity rate was in serogroup A, which was consistent with the findings of a seroepidemiologic study conducted in a larger population (N=986) [25]. The seropositivity rates and GMIs for the other serogroups were not significantly lower than previous findings (Table 3). Although we could not perform direct comparisons, patients with SLE did not appear to have significantly lower serum bactericidal activity.
Although patients with SLE did not show significantly low serum bactericidal activity, they cannot be assumed to have a similar protective ability against meningococci as healthy individuals. Given that rSBA employs an exogenous complement (as recommended by the World Health Organization [17]) rather than complements from patients, the hypocomplement state of the patients could not affect the results. This was further indicated by the lack of differences in the SBIs according to complement levels (Fig. 2). However, there was no significant decrease in the serum bactericidal antibody levels in patients with SLE. This indicates that even with antibody production through meningococcal vaccination, the actual defense against meningococcal disease may involve other components that are not heat-labile in the plasma, such as the complement system. Although the rSBI could be a marker of vaccine immunogenicity, it cannot be used as an immunological surrogate marker for protection against meningococci. The endogenous complement of patients can be a complement source in serum bactericidal activity; however, it is difficult to collect and preserve the complement from patients, and it is impossible to standardize the assay.
Similar to other infectious diseases, vaccination is the most effective preventive measure against meningococcal diseases, and various meningococcal vaccines have been developed to prevent infections. Meningococcal vaccines are also recommended for patients with SLE due to their heightened susceptibility to infections by encapsulated bacteria, such as Neisseria meningitidis. The 2021 EULAR/PRES guidelines emphasize the importance of these vaccinations, aligning with a broader strategy to prevent infections in immunocompromised individuals. Non-live vaccines, such as meningococcal vaccines, can be safely administered to patients with SLE [30]. Seroprotection is mainly preserved in patients receiving vaccinations for immunosuppression, except for high-dose GCs and B-cell depleting therapies [30,31]. However, recommendations, including the need for repeat doses or interval periods for meningococcal vaccination, remain unclear. The available meningococcal vaccines are yet to be formally tested in patients with SLE, including functional evaluations of complement activity. Immunogenicity and efficacy data for patients with SLE are required to establish a meningococcal immunization policy. Given the low rate of recorded adverse events in vaccine recipients and the increased susceptibility of patients with SLE to infections caused by encapsulated agents, such as N. meningitidis, meningococcal vaccines remain important and effective preventive measures in these patients [32]. In Korea, unlike the vaccination policies in the United States or Europe, meningococcal vaccination is not included in the National Immunization Program due to the low incidence of meningococcal disease, which may lead to an underestimation of its necessity. However, considering the potential risk of infection, meningococcal vaccination should be considered in situations such as communal living in dormitories, travel to high-risk areas, or the use of complement inhibitors like Eculizumab.
Several studies have reported an association between disease-related markers and SLE. A higher SLE disease activity index, lower complement levels, positivity for anti-dsDNA Ab, and frequent flare-ups are significantly associated with infection in SLE [1,33-35]. Recent studies have reported that infection is correlated with treatment patterns but not with disease activity markers [8,36]. These differences could be attributed to time of collection; moreover, the treatment patterns and disease characteristics in patients were different. There are conflicting findings regarding the impact of immunosuppressive drugs on the risk of infection in patients with SLE. Some studies have reported that immunosuppressants increase the risk of infection, while others do not [1,9,10,34,35]. In our study, there was no correlation between disease activity and GC doses with GMIs.
This study had several limitations. First, we did not include matched healthy controls. Therefore, direct comparisons with healthy individuals could not be performed. Second, we included a small sample size, which may have affected the subgroup analysis. To determine the correlation between disease activity and SBIs in patients with SLE, we used complement or anti-dsDNA Ab levels as disease-related markers. However, we did not use other clinical aspects such as flare-up frequency, SLE disease activity index, or follow-up duration. Using these factors as disease activity markers in future studies could elucidate their impact on serum bactericidal activity.
Although some patients with SLE showed serum bactericidal activity against meningococci, most remained seronegative. It is important for patients with SLE who are at risk of meningococcal infection to receive appropriate vaccinations. The findings from this study could serve as serological baseline data for the meningococcal vaccination policies in SLE patients.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest

HWK is a member of the editorial board of Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics. She was not involved in the editorial review or decision-making process for this manuscript. No other conflicts of interest are declared.

Funding

This study was supported by 2015 research grant to Soyoung Lee from the Korean Pediatric Society (MSD).

Author Contribution

Conceptualization: SYL, KHK, HWK; Data curation: SYL, JHL, HWK; Formal analysis: JHL, HWK; Funding acquisition: SYL; Methodology: KHK, HWK; Project administration: KHK, HWK; Visualization: HWK; Writing-orignial draft: SYL, KHK, HWK; Writing-review & editing: SYL, KHK, JHL, HWK

Fig. 1.
Scatter plot of serum bactericidal indices of the meningococcal serogroups.
cep-2024-01151f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
GMIs of the subanalysis based on the laboratory findings of disease activity (C3 <83 mg/dL, C4 <15 mg/dL, and anti-dsDNA Ab >7 IU). No significant differences in GMIs were noted according to complement consumption state or anti-dsDNA Ab positivity. anti-dsDNA Ab, anti-double-stranded DNA antibody; GMIs, geometric mean indices.
cep-2024-01151f2.jpg
cep-2024-01151f3.jpg
Table 1.
Characteristics of the study participants (N=41)
Characteristic Value
Age of enrollment (yr)
 Mean±SD 20.3±5.4
 Median (range) 20 (10–35)
Age of diagnosis (yr)
 Mean±SD 12.9±2.6
 Median (range) 13 (7–18)
Duration of disease (yr)
 Mean±SD 6.8±5.2
 Median (range) 6 (0–21)
Female sex 35 (85.4)
Laboratory findings, mean±SD
 WBC (μL) 6,479.0±2,686.4
 N/L ratio 3.8±3.3
 Hemoglobin (μL) 12.9±1.6
 Platelets (103/μL) 249.5±80.3
 ESR (mm/hr) 16.4±16.7
 Complement 3 (mg/dL) 82.5±26.1
 Complement 4 (mg/dL) 16.8±7.8
 Anti-dsDNA Ab (IU) 22.2±35.0
Medications
 Glucocorticoid, n (%) 39 (95.1)
  ≤7.5 mg/day 22 (53.7)
  >7.5 mg/day 17 (41.5)
 Hydroxychloroquine, n (%) 35 (85.4)
 Other immunosuppressants, n (%) a) 30 (73.2)

SD, standard deviation; WBC, white blood cell; N/L, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; anti-dsDNA Ab, anti-doublestranded DNA antibody.

Laboratory findings and medication information were based on test results at the time of serum bactericidal activity measurement.

a) Cyclosporin, azathioprine, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil

Table 2.
Geometric mean serum bactericidal indices (95% confidence interval) and seropositive rates by serogroup
Serogroups Geometric mean indices Seropositive rate (%)
SBI ≥8 SBI ≥128
A 11 (5–21) 17.1 (7.2–32.1) 17.1 (7.2–32.1)
C 107 (46–249) 63.4 (46.9–77.9) 51.2 (35.1–67.1)
W-135 46 (23–91) 56.1 (39.7–71.5) 46.3 (30.7–62.6)
Y 53 (27–106) 61.0 (44.5–75.8) 46.3 (30.7–62.6)

SBI, serum bactericidal index.

Table 3.
Seropositive rates of previous studies by serogroup of Korean adolescents and adults
Study Target population Serogroups
A C W-135 Y
This study (rSBA) Patient with SLE (10–35 years old, N=41) 17.1 (7.2–32.1) 63.4 (46.9–77.9) 56.1 (39.7–71.5) 61.0 (44.5–75.8)
Kang et al. 2016 (hSBA) [25] Healthy subjects (11–55 years old, N=987) 9 (7-11) 34 (31-37) 74 (71-77) 36 (33-39)
Lee et al. 2014 (hSBA) [29] Healthy subjects (11–55 years old, N=450) 15 39 87 53

Subgroup values presented as seropositive rate (%) (95% confidence interval).

rSBA, serum bactericidal index by serum bactericidal assay with rabbit complement; hSBA, serum bactericidal index by serum bactericidal assay with human complement; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.

References

1. Gladman DD, Hussain F, Ibañez D, Urowitz MB. The nature and outcome of infection in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2002;11:234–9.
crossref pmid pdf
2. Goldblatt F, Chambers S, Rahman A, Isenberg DA. Serious infections in British patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: hospitalisations and mortality. Lupus 2009;18:6829.
crossref pmid pdf
3. Teh CL, Wan SA, Ling GR. Severe infections in systemic lupus erythematosus: disease pattern and predictors of infection related mortality. Clin Rheumatol 2018;37:2081–6.
crossref pmid pdf
4. Cuchacovich R, Gedalia A. Pathophysiology and clinical spectrum of infections in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2009;35:75–93.
crossref pmid
5. Caza T, Oaks Z, Perl A. Interplay of infections, autoimmunity, and immunosuppression in systemic lupus erythematosus. Int Rev Immunol 2014;33:330–63.
crossref pmid
6. Kang I, Park SH. Infectious complications in SLE after immunosuppressive therapies. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2003;15:528–34.
crossref pmid
7. Kasturi S, Sammaritano LR. Corticosteroids in lupus. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2016;42:47–62.
crossref pmid
8. Ruiz-Irastorza G, Olivares N, Ruiz-Arruza I, Martinez-Berriotxoa A, Egurbide MV, Aguirre C. Predictors of major infections in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther 2009;11:R109.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
9. Feldman CH, Hiraki LT, Winkelmayer WC, Marty FM, Franklin JM, Kim SC, et al. Serious infections among adult Medicaid beneficiaries with systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2015;67:1577–85.
crossref pmid pmc
10. Rua-Figueroa I, López-Longo J, Galindo-Izquierdo M, CalvoAlén J, Campo VD, Olivé-Marqués A, et al. Incidence, associated factors and clinical impact of severe infections in a large, multicentric cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2017;47:38–45.
crossref pmid
11. Singh JA, Hossain A, Kotb A, Wells G. Risk of serious infections with immunosuppressive drugs and glucocorticoids for lupus nephritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC Med 2016;14:137.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
12. Suh CH, Jeong YS, Park HC, Lee CH, Lee J, Song CH, et al. Risk factors for infection and role of C-reactive protein in Korean patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2001;19:191–4.
pmid
13. Ugarte A, Danza A, Ruiz-Irastorza G. Glucocorticoids and antimalarials in systemic lupus erythematosus: an update and future directions. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2018;30:482–9.
crossref pmid
14. Mitchell SR, Nguyen PQ, Katz P. Increased risk of Neisserial infections in systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1990;20:174–84.
crossref pmid
15. Tan LKK, Carlone GM, Borrow R. Advances in the development of vaccines against Neisseria meningitidis. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1511–20.
crossref pmid
16. Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1997;40:1725.
crossref pmid
17. World Health Organization. Requirements for meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine (requirements for biological substances No. 23). In: WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization. Twenty-seventh Report. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization, 1976:50-74.

18. Maslanka SE, Gheesling LL, Libutti DE, Donaldson KB, Harakeh HS, Dykes JK, et al. Standardization and a multilaboratory comparison of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup A and C serum bactericidal assays. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1997;4:156–67.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
19. Andrews N, Borrow R, Miller E. Validation of serological correlate of protection for meningococcal C conjugate vaccine by using efficacy estimates from postlicensure surveillance in England. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2003;10:780–6.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
20. Goldschneider I, Gotschlich EC, Artenstein MS. Human immunity to the meningococcus. I. The role of humoral antibodies. J Exp Med 1969;129:1307–26.
pmid pmc
21. Feliciano R, Swedler W, Varga J. Infection with uncommon subgroup Y Neisseria meningitidis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Rheum 1999;17:737–40.

22. Ellison RT 3rd, Kohler PF, Curd JG, Judson FN, Reller LB. Prevalence of congenital or acquired complement deficiency in patients with sporadic meningocococcal disease. N Engl J Med 1983;308:913–6.
crossref pmid
23. Garty BZ, Nitzan M, Danon YL. Systemic meningococcal infections in patients with acquired complement deficiency. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 1993;4:6–9.
crossref pmid
24. Kjellman M, Laurel1 AB, Low B, Sjöholm AG. Homozygous deficiency of C4 in a child with a lupus erythematosus syndrome. Clin Genet 1982;22:331–9.
crossref pmid
25. Kang JH, Miao Y, Lee SY, Kim JH, Lee KY, Ma SH, et al. A survey of serum bactericidal antibodies against Neisseria meningitidis serogroups A, C, W and Y in adolescents and adults in the Republic of Korea. Infect Chemother 2016;48:12–9.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
26. Kim HW, Lee S, Lee JH, Woo SY, Kim KH. Comparison of immune responses to two quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccines (CRM197 and diphtheria toxoid) in healthy adults. J Korean Med Sci 2019;34:e169.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
27. Kim HW, Park IH, You S, Yu HT, Oh IS, Sung PS, et al. Immunogenicity of MenACWY-CRM in Korean military recruits: influence of tetanus-diphtheria toxoid vaccination on the vaccine response to MenACWY-CRM. Yonsei Med J 2016;57:1511–6.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
28. Kim DS, Kim MJ, Cha SH, Kim HM, Kim JH, Kim KN, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a single dose of a quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MenACYW-D): a multicenter, blind-observer, randomized, phase III clinical trial in the Republic of Korea. Int J Infect Dis 2016;45:59–64.
crossref pmid
29. Lee HJ, Chung MH, Kim WJ, Hong YJ, Choi KM, Lee J, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of a novel quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MenACWY-CRM) in healthy Korean adolescents and adults. Int J Infect Dis 2014;28:204–10.
crossref pmid
30. Jansen MHA, Rondaan C, Legger GE, Minden K, Uziel Y, Toplak N, et al. EULAR/PRES recommendations for vaccination of paediatric patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases: update 2021. Ann Rheum Dis 2023;82:35–47.
crossref pmid
31. Bragazzi NL, Watad A, Sharif K, Adawi M, Aljadeff G, Amital H, et al. Advances in our understanding of immunization and vaccines for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2017;13:939–49.
crossref pmid
32. Laribiere A, Miremont-Salame G, Reyre H, Abouelfath A, Liège L, Moore N, et al. Surveillance of adverse effects during a vaccination campaign against meningitis C. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2005;61:907–11.
crossref pmid pdf
33. Jeong SJ, Choi H, Lee HS, Han SH, Chin BS, Baek JH, et al. Incidence and risk factors of infection in a single cohort of 110 adults with systemic lupus erythematosus. Scand J Infect Dis 2009;41:268–74.
crossref pmid
34. Bosch X, Guilabert A, Pallarés L, Cerveral R, Ramos-Casals M, Bové A, et al. Infections in systemic lupus erythematosus: a prospective and controlled study of 110 patients. Lupus 2006;15:584–9.
crossref pmid pdf
35. Noël V, Lortholary O, Casassus P, Cohen P, Généreau T, André MH, et al. Risk factors and prognostic influence of infection in a single cohort of 87 adults with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 2001;60:1141–4.
crossref pmid pmc
36. Hou C, Jin O, Zhang X. Clinical characteristics and risk factors of infections in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rheumatol 2018;37:2699–705.
crossref pmid pdf
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  •  0 Scopus
  • 1,019 View
  • 44 Download